MARBURGER, COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL.

v.

PUBLIC FUNDS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NEW JERSEY ET AL.; AND GRIGGS ET AL. V. PUBLIC FUNDS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NEW JERSEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Meek v. Pittenger, 421 U.S. 349 (U.S. 1975)
  …be required for Pennsylvania to be “certain,” as it must be, that Act 194 personnel do not advance the religious mission of the church-related schools in which they serve. Public Funds for Public Schools v. Marburger, 358 F. Supp. 29, 40-41, aff’d, 417 U. S. 961.20 That Act 194 authorizes state funding of teachers only for remedial and exceptional students, and not for normal students participating in the core curriculum, does not distinguish this case from Earley v.DiCenso and Lemons. Kurtzman, supra. Whe…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Wolman v. Walter, 433 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1977)
  …eachers and guidance counselors remained neutral, the State would have to engage in continuing surveillance on the school premises.11 Id., at 372. See also Public Funds for Public Schools v. Marburger, 358 F. Supp. 29, 40 (NJ 1973), summarily aff’d, 417 U. S. 961 (1974). The Court in Meek explicitly stated, however, that the provision of diagnostic speech and hearing services by Pennsylvania seemed “to fall within that class of general welfare services for children that may be provided by the State regardles…
• Aguilar v. Felton, 473 U.S. 402 (U.S. 1985)
  …s panel of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed, holding that “[t]he Establishment Clause, as it has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in Public Funds for Public Schools v. Marburger, 358 F. Supp. 29 (D. N. J. 1973), aff’d mem., 417 U. S. 961 . . . (1974); Meek v. Pittenger, 421 U. S. 349 . . . (1975) (particularly Part V, pp. 367-72); and Wolman v. Walter, 433 U. S. 229 . . . (1977), constitutes an insurmountable barrier to the use of federal funds to send public school teachers and oth…

  ← 1 / 2 →