MCLAUGHLIN, WARDEN, ET AL.
v.
PRIETO ET AL.

U.S. | 1974-06-24
No. 73-1404
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Black-mun would grant certiorari and affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Blackmun’s dissenting opinion in Warden v. Marrero, 417 U. S. 653, 664 (1974).
418 U.S. 903 Supreme Court of the United States (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States ex rel. Larry David Hayden v. Zelker, 506 F.2d 1228 (2d Cir. 1974)
    …21 N.Y.2d at 597 n. *, 289 N.Y.S.2d at 949, 237 N.E. 2d at 209. . See, e. g., Alvarado v. McLaughlin, 486 F. 2d 541 (4th Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Warden v. Marrero, supra, sub nom. McLaughlin v. Prieto, 418 U.S. 903, 94 S.Ct. 3192, 41 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1974). . We note also that § 2189-a of the Penal Law of 1909 requires “a thorough psychiatric examination once every two years,” People v. Bailey, supra, 21 N.Y.2d at 597, 289 N.Y.S.2d at 949, 237 N.E. 2d at 209. An…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw