GARGALLO

v.

PRESIDING JUDGE, FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Califano v. Jobst, 434 U.S. 47 (U.S. 1977)
  …d his wife had become entitled to benefits under a newly enacted statute authorizing supplemental security income for the aged, blind, and disabled,4 this Court remanded the case for reconsideration in the light of that program. Weinberger v. Jobst, 419 U. S. 811. [*50] The District Court reviewed the new program, concluded that it had no relevance to the issues presented by this case, and reinstated its original judgment. The Secretary again appealed, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 429 U. S. 1089. Alt…
• Sumpter v. DeGROOTE, 552 F.2d 1206 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …he trial court for “determination of [her] sex pursuant to the [new] procedure.” Id. at 483, 306 N.E. 2d at 104. Sumpter then sought review by the United States Supreme Court, which dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Sumpter v. Indiana, 419 U.S. 811, 95 S.Ct. 25, 42 L.Ed.2d 38 (1974). On remand, Sumpter raised a timely double jeopardy objection to retrial of the sex issue. The trial court overruled the objection, denied a motion for a jury trial, took judicial notice that “she” was a female, r…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• Concerned Citizens of S. Ohio, Inc. v. Pine Creek Conservancy Dist., 429 U.S. 651 (U.S. 1977)
  …and rejected by it. On appeal here from such a decision, in the absence of relevant intervening circumstances, see, e. g., Guste v. Jackson, ante, p. 399; Town of Lockport v. Citizens for Community Action, 423 U. S. 808 (1975); Weinberger v. Jobst, 419 U. S. 811 (1974), or procedural irregularities in the District Court’s consideration of the case, e. g., Westby v. Doe, 420 U. S. 968 (1975), this Court ordinarily either affirms, modifies, or reverses the judgment of the District Court. But in this case it h…