BOWEN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 (U.S. 1975)
  …respondent’s motion to suppress should have been granted.2 499 F. 2d 1109 (1974). We granted certiorari and set the case for oral argument with No. 73-2050, United States v. Ortiz, post, p. 891, and No. 73-6848, Bowen v. United States, post, p. 916. 419 U. S. 824 (1974). The Government does not challenge the Court of Appeals’ factual conclusion that the stop of respondent’s car was a roving-patrol stop rather than a checkpoint stop. Brief for United States 8. Nor does it challenge the retroactive applicatio…
• United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. 891 (U.S. 1975)
  …16, to the effect that our decision in Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U. S. 266 (1973), required probable cause for all vehicle searches in the border area, whether conducted by roving patrols or at traffic checkpoints. We granted certiorari. 419 U. S. 824 (1974). Nothing in this record suggests that the Border Patrol officers had any special reason to suspect that respondent’s car was carrying concealed aliens. Nor does the Government contend that the San Clemente checkpoint is a functional equivale…
• Rogers v. United States, 422 U.S. 35 (U.S. 1975)
  …es,” in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 871 (a). The Court of Appeals affirmed, 488 F. 2d 512 (CA5 1974), and we granted certiorari to resolve an apparent conflict among the Courts of Appeals concerning the elements of the offense proscribed by §871 (a). 419 U. S. 824 (1974). After full briefing and argument, however, we find it unnecessary to reach that question, since certain circumstances of petitioner’s trial satisfy us that the conviction must be reversed. The record reveals that the jury retired for delibe…