DELLACROCE

v.

UNITED STATES; AND CATALANO V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (61 total)

• Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo, 439 U.S. 572 (U.S. 1979)
  …. Prop. J. 231, 232 (1976). Reporter’s transcript on appeal in No. D 860954 (Super. Ct. Los Angeles) 23; Tr. of Oral Arg. 32. Petition for Hearing in No. LA 30712 (Cal. Sup. Ct.), p. 14. In re Fithian, 10 Cal. 3d 592, 517 P. 2d 449, cert. denied, 419 U. S. 825 (1974) (federal military retirement pay); cf. In re Brown, 15 Cal. 3d 838, 544 P. 2d 561 (1976) (nonvested interest in a private employer’s retirement plan); see generally Martin, Social Security Benefits for Spouses, 63 Cornell L. Rev. 789, 830-836…
• Pelletier v. Zweifel, 921 F.2d 1465 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …nded victim would have acted on the misrepresentations: were the misrepresentations “reasonably calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence [*1499] and comprehension.” United States v. Bruce, 488 F. 2d 1224, 1229 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 825, 95 S.Ct. 41, 42 L.Ed.2d 48 (1974); see United States v. Netterville, 553 F. 2d 903, 909 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 861, 1009, 98 S.Ct. 189, 719, 54 L.Ed.2d 135 (1978).73 This does not mean, however, that we look at a defendant’s action…
• McCARTY v. McCARTY, 453 U.S. 210 (U.S. 1981)
  …lause, U. S. Const., Art. VI, cl. 2, precluded the trial court from awarding appellee a portion of his retired pay.9 The court noted that this precise contention had [*219] been rejected in In re Fithian, 10 Cal. 3d 592, 517 P. 2d 449, cert, denied, 419 U. S. 825 (1974).10 Furthermore, the court concluded that the result in Fithian had not been called into question by this Court’s subsequent decision in Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo, supra, where it was held that benefits payable under the federal Railroad Retire…