SMITH ET AL.

v.

INDIANA STATE BOARD OF HEALTH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• United States v. McCONNEY, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …someone with no right to be there. Id. at 589, 88 S.Ct. at 1757. The interval of time an officer must wait between announcement and entry depends on the circumstances of each case. See United States v. Phelps, 490 F. 2d 644 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 836, 95 S.Ct. 64, 42 L.Ed.2d 63 (1974). When police have properly knocked and announced their identity and purpose, mild exigency is sufficient to justify simultaneous entry when entry can be accomplished without physical destruction of property. Unite…
• Emra Joseph Bonham v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 569 F.2d 187 (3d Cir. 1977)
  …ggrieved individual initially to seek redress from the state agency before instituting suit in federal court. See also McGarvey v. Merck & Co., 359 F.Supp. 525 (D.N.J.1973), vacated without published opinion, 493 F. 2d 1401 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 836, 95 S.Ct. 64, 42 L.Ed.2d 63 (1974); Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co., 550 F. 2d 834, 844 (3rd Cir. 1977), petition for cert. filed, 46 U.S.L.W. 3108 (U.S. Aug. 30, 1977). Both the Rogers and Goger courts examined equitable considerations a…
• State OF Ill. v. Sangamo Constr. Co. & J. L. Simmons Co., Inc., 657 F.2d 855 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …torneys’ fees in excess of damages); Copper Liquor, 624 F. 2d at 584 (“a modest damage award should not control an attorneys’ fee award”) (footnote omitted); Morning Pioneer, Inc. v. Bismarck Tribune Co., 493 F. 2d 383, 390 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 836, 95 S.Ct. 64, 42 L.Ed.2d 63 (1974) (not an abuse of discretion to award attorneys’ fees in excess of damages); and Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp., 378 F.Supp. at 427-28 (where damages are relatively small, it is permissible to award fees in excess o…