ROSA
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1974-10-15
No. 73-6612
419 U.S. 850 Supreme Court of the United States (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Al Taylor, 562 F.2d 1345 (2d Cir. 1977)
    …een called to testify and had waived his Fifth Amendment privilege. It is not improper to deny a request for a subpoena where the testimony of the witness would be only cumulative, United States v. Rosa, 493 F. 2d 1191, 1194 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 850, 95 S.Ct. 89, 42 L.Ed.2d 80 (1974), where the defendant is vague as to the witness’s potential evidence and is also aware that the witness might invoke the Fifth Amendment, United States v. Wyler, 487 F. 2d 170, 173-74 (2d Cir. 1973), or where the w…
  • Singleton v. The Honorable Louis J. Lefkowitz, 583 F.2d 618 (2d Cir. 1978)
    …een called to testify and had waived his Fifth Amendment privilege. It is not improper to deny a request for a subpoena where the testimony of the witness would be only cumulative, United States v. Rosa, 493 F. 2d 1191, 1194 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 850, 95 S.Ct. 89, 42 L.Ed.2d 80 (1974), where the defendant is vague as to the witness’s potential evidence and is also aware that the witness might invoke the Fifth Amendment, United States v. Wyler, 487 F. 2d 170, 173-74 (2d Cir. 1973), or where the w…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw