LILES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Smith v. Saxbe, 562 F.2d 729 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …een years imprisonment for armed robbery (22 D.C.Code §§ 2901, 3202). These sentences were to run concurrently. We affirmed these convictions on February 11, 1974. United States v. Joyner and Smith, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 384, 492 F. 2d 650, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 852, 95 S.Ct. 94, 42 L.Ed.2d 83 (1974). . According to the complaint, plaintiff received over fifty furloughs between late 1973 and September 1974. . Congress empowered the Attorney General to initiate furlough programs; 18 U.S.C. 4082(c)(1) provides;…
• United States v. Ervy T. Frederick, 583 F.2d 273 (6th Cir. 1978)
  …held, however, that the destruction of such notes does not constitute a violation of the Jencks Act. See, e. g., United States v. McCallie, 554 F. 2d 770, 773 (6th Cir. 1977); United States v. Stephens, 492 F. 2d 1367, 1377 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 852, 95 S.Ct. 93, 42 L.Ed.2d 83 (1974). Accordingly, appellant’s contentions are without merit. Finally, Frederick argues that the district court erred in refusing to dismiss the indictment based on the Petite Policy of the Department of Justice which…