ROBERTS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• United States v. Valle-Valdez, 554 F.2d 911 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …States v. Henny, supra, 527 F. 2d at 484-85, United States v. Davis, 501 F. 2d 1344, 1345 (9th Cir. 1974), United States v. Goodrich, 493 F. 2d 390, 394 (9th Cir. 1974), and United States v. Murray, 492 F. 2d 178, 198 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 854, 95 S.Ct. 98, 42 L.Ed.2d 87 (1974). The standards guiding appellate determination of harmless error are variable, often confus [*915] ing and frequently left unarticulated. Basically, however, those standards are statements of the degree of certaint…
• United States v. Kaplan, 554 F.2d 958 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …equires a dismissal of the indictment against him.7 A showing of fundamental error is necessary before we will consider issues not raised below. United States v. Murray, 492 F. 2d 178 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied sub nom., Roberts v. United States, 419 U.S. 854, 95 S.Ct. 98, 42 L.Ed.2d 87 (1974). See Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b). No such error has been shown to exist. Appellant has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by the challenged prosecutorial conduct. He has failed to show that his role as an informer ac…
• United States v. Bermudez, 526 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …the time during which the conspiracy was operative and the statute allegedly violated, even if it fails to allege any specific overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. See United States v. Murray, 492 F. 2d 178, 192 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 854, 95 S.Ct. 98, 42 L.Ed.2d 87 (1974); cf. Singer v. United States, 323 U.S. 338, 65 S.Ct. 282, 89 L.Ed. 285 (1945) (Douglas, J.) (no overt act requirement for conspiracy offense under draft evasion statute); Nash v. United States, 229 U.S. 373, 378, 3…