MIRIN

v.

CLARK COUNTY TAXICAB AUTHORITY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. Ruel Frank Brown, Jr., 591 F.2d 307 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …resentation by a lay person. See Weber v. Garza, 570 F. 2d 511 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Arlt, 560 F. 2d 200 (5th Cir. 1977), after remand, 567 F. 2d 1295 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Cooper, 493 F. 2d 473, 474 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 859, 95 S.Ct. 108, 42 L.Ed.2d 93 (1974). In this case, the district court explained to Brown that he was not entitled to appointed counsel of his own choosing. Brown’s persistence in refusing to accept any counsel except that of his own choosing and hi…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Grismore, 546 F.2d 844 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …presentation by a lay person. “Counsel” as referred to in the Sixth Amendment does not include a lay person, rather “counsel” refers to a person authorized to the practice of law. United States v. Cooper, 493 F. 2d 473 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 859, 95 S.Ct. 108, 42 L.Ed.2d 93 (1974); Guajardo v. Luna, 432 F. 2d 1324 (5th Cir. 1970); Harrison v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 245, 387 F. 2d 203 (1967), reversed on other grounds, 392 U.S. 219, 88 S.Ct. 2008, 20 L.Ed.2d 1047 (1968); McKinzie v.…
• Solina v. United States, 709 F.2d 160 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …We also exclude from consideration, on the ground of waiver, those cases in which the defendant knew of his representative’s unlicensed status, e.g., United States v. Whitesel, supra; United States v. Cooper, 493 F. 2d 473 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 859, 95 S.Ct. 108, 42 L.Ed.2d 93 (1974); United States v. Stockheimer, 385 F.Supp. 979 (W.D.Wis.1974). . Our decision here suggests that prosecutors, trial courts, or both, would do well to make sure that persons representing criminal defendants are du…