FRANCES MALCOLM LOTT

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Tribune Co. v. L.R. Huffstetler, Jr., 489 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 1986)
  …er the statute. Simply because the circuit court cited Tunstall with contempt for refusing to cooperate does not alter the fact that Tunstall does not fall within the purview of the statute. Martin v. State, 194 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 201 So. 2d 551 (Fla.1967). Although Tunstall did stand to suffer a deprivation of his liberty if he did not comply with the court order, this civil contempt proceeding was separate from the underlying investigation. Tunstall stood in no different position after th…
• Martin v. Louie L. Wainwright, 428 F.2d 356 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …(Fla.1952). . If these contentions involve such glaring errors of state law, it is not shown why they were not presented on Martin’s direct appeal in the state courts. See Martin v. State, 195 So. 2d 9 (Fla.App. 1967), cert. denied Martin v. State, 201 So. 2d 551 (Fla.1967). . Herbert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 47 S.Ct. 103, 104, 71 L.Ed. 270 (1926). See Flagler v. Wainwright, 423 F. 2d 1359 (5th Cir. 1970).…
• Fla. State Bd. of Dentistry v. Mack, 401 U.S. 960 (U.S. 1971)
  …on proceedings in the state courts where he urged, without success, “that the procedure before the Dental Board was such that he was deprived of a fair and impartial trial.” Mack v. Pepper, 192 So. 2d 66, 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966), cert. denied, 201 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1967). Mack did not seek certiorari in this Court, but instead commenced an action in federal district court seeking relief under 42 U. S, C. § 1983. He argued in the District Court that the proceedings before the State Board were unconstituti…

Authorities Cited

• Lott v. State, 193 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)