ANCHOR MOTOR FREIGHT, INC.

v.

SCOTT

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• Arney v. Dep't OF Natural Res., 448 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …st “persons.” Florida is not a person within the meaning of § 1983 and, therefore, is not subject to a § 1983 claim for damages by way of a suit against DNR, an arm of state government. Cheramie v. Tucker, 493 F. 2d 586 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 868, 95 S.Ct. 126, 42 L,Ed.2d 107 (1974); Florida Businessmen for Free Enterprise v. Florida, 499 F.Supp. 346 (N.D.Fla.1980). The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants as to Count III which sought a declaratory judgment. This was prop…
• Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. Scheb, 995 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …has never been doubted that a complaint asserting a class action could be dismissed on the merits before determining whether the suit could be maintained as a class action. See, e.g., Jacobs v. Gromatsky, 494 F. 2d 513, 514 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 868, 95 S.Ct. 126, 42 L.Ed.2d 107 (1974). Miller v. Mackey International, Inc., 452 F. 2d 424, 428-29 (5th Cir.1971). To require notice to be sent to all potential plaintiffs in a class action when the underlying claim is without merit is to promote ine…
• Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd., 601 F.2d 429 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …Ford Motor Co., 353 F. 2d 710 (7th Cir. 1965); Judice’s Sunshine Pontiac, Inc. v. Gen. Motor Corp., 418 F.Supp. 1212 (D.N.J.1976); Rea v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F.Supp. 842 (W.D.Pa.1972), vacated on other grounds, 497 F. 2d 577 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 868, 95 S.Ct. 126, 42 L.Ed.2d 106 (1974), on remand, 406 F.Supp. 271 (W.D.Pa.1975); and Klebanow v. N. Y. Produce Exch., 344 F. 2d 294 (2d Cir. 1965); (where seemingly contrary results were reached, but on distinguishable facts, involving corporate or p…