UNITED STATES

v.

HAMILTON

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Willi Beusch & Deak & Co. of Cal., Inc., 596 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …marized in considerable detail. The abundant detail might, by itself, be enough to make this affidavit inherently reliable. See United States v. Toral, 536 F. 2d 893 (9th Cir. 1976); United States v. Hamilton, 490 F. 2d 598 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 880, 95 S.Ct. 145, 42 L.Ed.2d 120 (1974). But other facts make it unnecessary for us to rely solely on the detail evident in the affidavit to uphold its validity. Other information contained in the affidavit corroborates the information gleaned from th…
• United States v. Harlen Manuel, 706 F.2d 908 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …of severe head injuries. See Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307, 313, 79 S.Ct. 329, 333, 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959); United States v. Goff, 681 F. 2d 1238, 1240 (9th Cir. 1982); United States v. Hamilton, 490 F. 2d 598, 600-01 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 880, 95 S.Ct. 145, 42 L.Ed.2d 120 (1974); see also 1 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 3.3, at 557-58 (1978). Our discussion is meant only to show the presence of an issue we need not decide in light of our conclusion that any possible illegality in Manue…
• United States v. Bush, 647 F.2d 357 (3d Cir. 1981)
  …tates v. Fluker, 543 F. 2d 709 (9th Cir. 1976); United States v. Carmichael, 489 F. 2d 979 (7th Cir. 1972). . See, e. g., United States v. Montgomery, 554 F. 2d 754 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Hamilton, 490 F. 2d 598 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 880, 95 S.Ct. 145, 42 L.Ed.2d 120 (1974); United States v. Myers, 538 F. 2d 424, 427 (D.C. Cir. 1976) (Leventhal, J., dissenting); Stanley v. State, 19 Md.App. 507, 313 A. 2d 847. See generally LaFave, supra, at § 3.3(f); Comment, Adequacy of Informant’…