UNITED STATES

v.

BANKERS TRUST CO. ET AL., TRUSTEES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Curtiss-Wright Corp., 584 F.2d 1195 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …t more complete and reliable data than was offered at the first trial. The retrial need not precede the new election of directors that we have ordered. See Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F. 2d 851, 868-70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883, 95 S.Ct. 150, 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); FTC v. PepsiCo, Inc., 447 F. 2d 24, 28-31 (2d Cir. 1973). THE SECTION 8 CLAIM Section 8 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 19, provides in pertinent part that no person shall be a director of two competing corpor…
• Chromalloy Am. Corp. v. SUN Chem. Corp. & Norman E. Alexander, 611 F.2d 240 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …lan. We do not agree with Sun’s contention that disclosure of Sun’s control purpose will mislead investors by overstating the definiteness of Sun’s plans. Cf. Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F. 2d 851, 872 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883, 95 S.Ct. 150, 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974) (disclosure of intention to substantially expand target company would be misleading where purchaser’s twenty year study included this possibility but where no plan was adopted); Susquehanna Corp. v. Pan American…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• In re Chicago, 611 F.2d 662 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …the Debtor can be reorganized within a reasonable time. See In re Erie Lackawanna Railway Co., 563 F. 2d 784 (6th Cir. 1977); In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 494 F. 2d 270 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. United States v. Bankers Trust Co., 419 U.S. 883, 95 S.Ct. 147, 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974) (hereinafter Columbus Option); In re Third Avenue Transit Corp., 198 F. 2d 703 (2d Cir. 1952). We considered this test in a prior case and observed that even the circuits which formulated it have not applied it c…