WALL ET AL.

v.

HARDWICK ET AL.; AND HARDWICK ET AL. V. WALL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 (U.S. 1981)
  …n), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1029 (1976); Harfst v. Hoegen, 349 Mo. 808, 815-816, 163 S. W. 2d 609, 613-614 (Mo. 1942) (en banc) (same). See Mo. Const., Art. 1, §§ 6, 7; Art. 9, § 8. In Luetkemeyer v. Kaufmann, 364 F. Supp. 376 (WD Mo. 1973), aff'd, 419 U. S. 888 (1974), the District Court found Missouri had a compelling interest in compliance with its own Constitution. U. S. Const., Art. VI, cl. 2. See, e. g., Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U. S. 104, 116 (1972) (“The nature of a place, ‘the pattern of…
• City OF Rome v. United States, 446 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1980)
  …at the State had conducted elections in English only, thereby [*199] violating the Act. New York v. United States, C. A. No. 2419-71 (DC Jan. 18, 1974) (referring to Torres v. Sachs, C. A. No. 73-3921 (CES) (SDNY Sept. 27, 1973)), summarily aff’d, 419 U. S. 888 (1974). Bailout was denied in one action involving a local subdivision, Gaston County, N. C. v. United States, 395 U. S. 285 (1969), and three were dismissed by stipulation of the parties, Board of Commissioners, El Paso County, Colo. v. United Sta…
• United Jewish Orgs. of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. Carey, 430 U.S. 144 (U.S. 1977)
  …several years of litigation, the District Court for the District of Columbia denied the exemption and ordered the State to comply with the filing requirements of § 5. This Court summarily affirmed. New York ex rel. New York County v. United States, 419 U. S. 888 (1974). See 510 F. 2d 512, 516 (CA2 1975). Title 28 CFR § 51.19 (1976) provides: “Section 5, in providing for submission to the Attorney General as an alternative to seeking a declaratory judgment from the U. S. District Court for the District of…