SOUTHEASTERN PROMOTIONS, LTD.

v.

CONRAD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Rinaldi v. United States, 434 U.S. 22 (U.S. 1977)
  …which is “just under the circumstances,” 28 U. S. C. § 2106, we have granted the Government’s motion on several occasions. See Watts v. United States, 422 U. S. 1032 (1975); Ackerson v. United States, 419 U. S. 1099 (1975); Hayles v. United States, 419 U. S. 892 (1974); Cf. Redmond v. United [*26] States, 384 U. S. 264 (1966); Marakar v. United States, 370 U. S. 723 (1962); Petite v. United States, 361 U. S. 529 (1960). The majority described the Government’s bad faith in the following terms: “In this cas…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Nelligan, 573 F.2d 251 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …nized that Petite is an internal policy of self-restraint that should not be enforced against the government. See Fry v. United States, 5 Cir., 1978, 569 F. 2d 303, 304;6 United States v. Hayles, 5 Cir., 492 F. 2d 125, 126, vacated on other grounds, 419 U.S. 892, 95 S.Ct. 168, 42 L.Ed.2d 136 (1974).7 AFFIRMED. . 18 U.S.C. § 1343 provides: Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, represen…
• Thompson v. United States, 444 U.S. 248 (U.S. 1980)
  …States, 435 U. S. 911 (1978); Rinaldi v. United States, 434 U. S. 22 (1977); Croucher v. United States, 429 U. S. 1034 (1977); Watts v. United States, 422 U. S. 1032 (1975); Ackerson v. United States, 419 U. S. 1099 (1975); Hayles v. United States, 419 U. S. 892 (1974); Thompson v. United States, 400 U. S. 17 (1970); Marakar v. United States, 370 U. S. 723 (1962); Petite v. United States, 361 U. S. 529 (1960). This practice, which rests on the power of the Court to “afford relief which is ‘just under the c…