ROE ET AL.

v.

NORTON, COMMISSIONER OF WELFARE

Citator

Cited By

• Herring v. New York, 422 U.S. 853 (U.S. 1975)
  …isonment with a maximum of four years. The conviction was affirmed without opinion by an intermediate appellate court.5 Leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals was denied. An appeal was then brought here, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 419 U. S. 893. II The Sixth Amendment guarantees to the accused in all criminal prosecutions the rights to a “speedy and [*857] public trial,” to an “impartial jury,” to notice of the “nature and cause of the accusation,” to be “confronted” with opposing witnes…
• Stanton v. Stanton, 421 U.S. 7 (U.S. 1975)
  …us, was held not entitled to support for Sherri for the period after she attained 18, but was entitled to support for Rick “during his minority” unless otherwise ordered by the trial court. Ibid., 517 P. 2d, at 1014. We noted probable jurisdiction. 419 U. S. 893 (1974). [*11] i — ! The appellee initially suggests that the support issue is moot and that, in any event, the appellant lacks standing. These arguments are related and we reject both of them. A. The mootness suggestion is based on the proposition…
• United States v. Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank, 422 U.S. 86 (U.S. 1975)
  …ppellees here — are C&S National, C&S Holding, six of the 5-percent banks, and two banks in the Atlanta area, C&S Emory and C&S East Point, which are subsidiaries of C&S Holding. Taken together, these will sometimes be called the “defendant banks.” 419 U. S. 893. Notice of appeal was filed prior to the effective date of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, Pub. L. 93-528, § 7, 88 Stat. 1710. The proposed acquisitions were stayed automatically by the filing of the suit, 12 U. S. C. § 1828 (c) (7) (A).…