JOHNSON ET AL.

v.

MISSISSIPPI ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Stanton v. Stanton, 421 U.S. 7 (U.S. 1975)
  …us, was held not entitled to support for Sherri for the period after she attained 18, but was entitled to support for Rick “during his minority” unless otherwise ordered by the trial court. Ibid., 517 P. 2d, at 1014. We noted probable jurisdiction. 419 U. S. 893 (1974). [*11] i — ! The appellee initially suggests that the support issue is moot and that, in any event, the appellant lacks standing. These arguments are related and we reject both of them. A. The mootness suggestion is based on the proposition…
• Johnson v. Mississippi, 421 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1975)
  …s before it can be invoked as a basis for removal of prosecutions under § 1443 (1). Rehearing and rehearing en banc, Fed. Rule App. Proc. 35, were denied, five Circuit Judges dissenting in an opinion.7 491 F. 2d 94 (CA5 1974). We granted certiorari, 419 U. S. 893 (1974), and, for reasons stated below, affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. [*219] II Our most recent cases construing § 1443 (1) are the companion cases of Georgia v. Rachel, supra, and City of Greenwood v. Peacock, supra. Those cases esta…
• Costarelli v. Massachusetts, 421 U.S. 193 (U.S. 1975)
  …ipal Court or the Superior Court. He also raised speedy trial and double jeopardy contentions as bars to his retrial before a jury. On October 21, 1974, we postponed further consideration of the question of jurisdiction to the hearing on the merits. 419 U. S. 893. We now dismiss for want of jurisdiction. Title 28 U. S. C. § 1257 limits our review to the judgment of the highest state court in which a decision could be had, and we conclude that this is not such a judgment. That a decision of a higher state co…