VIERA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• State v. Welker, 536 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 1988)
  …ere remains the question of whether we should follow Justice White’s plurality opinion, which has become the rule in federal courts. United States v. Diaz, 535 F. 2d 130 (1st Cir.1976); United States v. James, 495 F. 2d 434 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 899, 95 S.Ct. 181, 42 L.Ed.2d 144 (1974); United States v. Bonanno, 487 F. 2d 654 (2d Cir.1973). In explaining why the informer’s presence at trial is constitutionally unnecessary, Justice White wrote: “[T]he issue of whether specified events on a certa…
• Davis v. State OF Ala., 596 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …5 Cir. 1978) that a showing of prejudice is required for the reversal of a conviction, saying: “[W]e cannot reverse appellant’s conviction in the absence of a showing of prejudice. See United States v. James, 495 F. 2d 434 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 899, 95 S.Ct. 181, 42 L.Ed.2d 144 (1974); United States v. Saitta, 443 F. 2d 830, 831 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 404 U.S. 938, 92 S.Ct. 269, 30 L.Ed.2d 250 (1971).” The record shows that petitioner’s trial counsel were active in his defense. Besides fili…
• United States v. Loschiavo, 531 F.2d 659 (2d Cir. 1976)
  …at 2304, 41 L.Ed.2d at 118; Kaufman v. United States, 394 U.S. 217, 227 n. 8, 89 S.Ct. 1068, 1074, 22 L.Ed.2d 227, 237 (1969); United States v. Wright, 524 F. 2d 1100, 1102 (2 Cir. 1975); United States v. West, 494 F. 2d 1314 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 899, 95 S.Ct. 180, 42 L.Ed.2d 144 (1974); United States v. Coke, 404 F. 2d 836, 846-47 (2 Cir. 1968). That the general rule is not absolute is indicated by what the Supreme Court said in Sunal v. Large, supra. “The rule which requires resort to appella…