BOWDACH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• Levenson v. Am. Laser Corp., 438 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …e its discretion in approving or rejecting the proposed consent agreement; it is not within the court’s discretion to insist upon modification of the proposed agreement. See Bryan v. Pittsburg Plate Glass Co., 494 F. 2d 799 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 900, 95 S.Ct. 184, 42 L.Ed.2d 146 (1974). See also Home Development of St. Petersburg v. Bursani, 178 So. 2d 113 (Fla.1965); Steiner v. Physician’s Protective Trust Fund, 388 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), petition for review denied, 397 So. 2d 779 (Fl…
• United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Indus., Inc., 517 F.2d 826 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …2 Cir. 1974, 495 F. 2d 448, 455-56 (objectors must show clear abuse of discretion in trial court’s approval of settlement); Bryan v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 3 Cir. 1974, 494 F. 2d 799, 803, cert. denied, Abate v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, 419 U.S. 900, 95 S.Ct. 184, 42 L.Ed.2d 146 (1974) (settlement not unfair simply because many class members oppose it); Greenspun v. Bogan, 1 Cir. 1974, 492 F. 2d 375, 381 (only where one side is so clearly correct that offer in compromise becomes clearly unreaso…
• United Hous. Found., Inc. v. Forman (W.D. Pa. 1975)
  …rities and to adopt the “risk capital” approach articulated by the California Supreme Court in Silver Hills Country Club v. Sobieski, 55 Cal. 2d 811, 361 P. 2d 906 (1961). Cf. El Khadem v. Equity Securities Corp., 494 F. 2d 1224 (CA9), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 900 (1974). See generally Coffey, The Economic Realities of a “Security”: Is There a More Meaningful Formula?, 18 W. Res. L. Rev. 367 (1967); Long, An Attempt to Return “Investment Contracts” to the Mainstream of Securities Regulation, 24 Okla. L. Rev.…