SMITH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• Levenson v. Am. Laser Corp., 438 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …e its discretion in approving or rejecting the proposed consent agreement; it is not within the court’s discretion to insist upon modification of the proposed agreement. See Bryan v. Pittsburg Plate Glass Co., 494 F. 2d 799 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 900, 95 S.Ct. 184, 42 L.Ed.2d 146 (1974). See also Home Development of St. Petersburg v. Bursani, 178 So. 2d 113 (Fla.1965); Steiner v. Physician’s Protective Trust Fund, 388 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), petition for review denied, 397 So. 2d 779 (Fl…
• United Hous. Found., Inc. v. Forman (W.D. Pa. 1975)
  …rities and to adopt the “risk capital” approach articulated by the California Supreme Court in Silver Hills Country Club v. Sobieski, 55 Cal. 2d 811, 361 P. 2d 906 (1961). Cf. El Khadem v. Equity Securities Corp., 494 F. 2d 1224 (CA9), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 900 (1974). See generally Coffey, The Economic Realities of a “Security”: Is There a More Meaningful Formula?, 18 W. Res. L. Rev. 367 (1967); Long, An Attempt to Return “Investment Contracts” to the Mainstream of Securities Regulation, 24 Okla. L. Rev.…
• Rush Pettway v. Am. Cast Iron Pipe Co., 576 F.2d 1157 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …on v. Hinton, supra, 559 F. 2d at 1331. See Flinn v. FMC Corp., 528 F. 2d 1169, 1173 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 967, 96 S.Ct. 1462, 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976); Bryan v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 494 F. 2d 799, 803 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 900, 95 S.Ct. 184, 42 L.Ed.2d 146 (1974). The trial court is entitled to take account of the judgment of experienced counsel for the parties. Cotton v. Hinton, supra, 559 F. 2d at 1330. These rules, however, do not mean that the approval of plaintiffs…