PERSICO ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES
PERSICO ET AL.
UNITED STATES
419 U.S. 924
Supreme Court of the United States (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 40 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
In re Contempt Proceedings against Zaven Melickian v. United States, 547 F.2d 416 (8th Cir. 1977)…d 157 (2nd Cir. 1975); Droback v. United States, 509 F. 2d 625 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 964, 95 S.Ct. 1952, 44 L.Ed.2d 450 (1975); In Re Lochiatto, 497 F. 2d 803 (1st Cir. 1974); In Re Persico, 491 F. 2d 1156 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 924, 95 S.Ct. 199, 42 L.Ed.2d 158, rehearing denied, 419 U.S. 1060, 95 S.Ct. 645, 42 L.Ed.2d 657 (1974).…
-
Shakman v. Democratic Org. OF Cook Cnty., 533 F.2d 344 (7th Cir. 1976)…nction between criminal and civil contempt is the nature of the [*349] relief asked and the purpose of that relief.” 3 C. Wright, Federal Practice & Procedure § 704, at 159 (1969); see also In re Persico, 491 F. 2d 1156 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 924, 95 S.Ct. 199, 42 L.Ed.2d 158 (1974); Southern Railway Company v. Lanham, 403 F. 2d 119, 124 (5th Cir. 1968); Comment, Right to Trial in Contempt Cases: A Critical View of the Sentence Aggregation Rules, 70 Nw.U.L.Rev. 533, 534 n.3 (1975). In Gomper…
-
In re Millow, 529 F.2d 770 (2d Cir. 1976)…ing electronic surveillance and Judge Pierce’s determination of the validity of that order precludes Millow from further litigating in a contempt proceeding the legality of that surveillance. In In re Persico, 491 F. 2d 1156 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 924, 95 S.Ct. 199, 42 L.Ed.2d 158 (1974), this court confronted a claimed inconsistency in a statute that forbids the use in grand jury proceedings of evidence derived from illegal wiretapping, 18 U.S.C. § 2515, and yet precludes the use of suppression…
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence