FOWLER

v.

NORTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325 (U.S. 1976)
  …295, was one of four factors which together led Mr. Justice BrenNAN to invalidate the statute before us in Furman v. Georgia. The statutes are summarized in the Appendix to petitioner’s brief in No. 73-7031, Fowler v. North Carolina, cert. granted, 419 U. S. 963 (1974), and in Appendix A to the petitioner’s brief in No. 75-5394, Jurek v. Texas, ante, p. 262, decided this day. The various types of -post-Furman statutes which have been enacted are described and analyzed in the Note, Discretion and the Constit…
• Goldfarb et ux. v. Va. State BAR (W.D. Pa. 1975)
  …court concluded that a title examination is generally a local service, and even where it is part of a transaction which crosses state lines its effect on commerce is only “incidental,” and does not justify federal regulation. We granted certiorari, 419 U. S. 963 (1974), and are thus confronted for the first time with the question of whether the Sherman Act applies to services performed by attorneys in examining titles in connection with financing the purchase of real estate. II Our inquiry can be divided…
• Philbrook v. Glodgett (W.D. Pa. 1975)
  …llant Philbrook, Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Social Welfare, in No. 73-1820, and postponed consideration of the question of jurisdiction in the appeal of appellant Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, in No. 74^132. 419 U. S. 963 (1974). Philbrook’s appeal presents only the question of whether the Vermont welfare regulation in question conflicts with § 407 (b) (2) (C) (ii) of the Act, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 607 (b)(2) (C)(ii), while the Secretary’s appeal presents the…