MIRANDA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …tates v. Gallipoli, 599 F. 2d 100, 103 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Guthartz, 573 F. 2d 225, 227 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864, 99 S.Ct. 187, 58 L.Ed.2d 173 (1978); United States v. Miranda, 494 F. 2d 783, 788 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 966, 95 S.Ct. 228, 42 L.Ed.2d 181 (1974). In this case the indictment clearly states the offense charged with sufficient specificity. The acts are alleged to have occurred in the Western District of Texas, and are said to have consisted of a number of…
• United States v. Murray, 618 F.2d 892 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …e. The government thus had no duty to prove that appellants were neither registered nor exempted from registration. United States v. Felts, 602 F. 2d 146, 148 (7th Cir. 1979); United States v. Miranda, 494 F. 2d 783, 785-87 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 966, 95 S.Ct. 228, 42 L.Ed.2d 181 (1974); United States v. Brown, 482 F. 2d 1226, 1229-30 (8th Cir. 1973). This statutory scheme does not offend due process, for the government bears the burden of proving non-registration or non-entitlement once the d…
• United States v. Arteaga-Limones, 529 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …f 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), was fatally defective in that it failed to allege any location for [*1188] the commission of the offense.1 They support their position with language from United States v. Miranda, 494 F. 2d 783, 788 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 966, 95 S.Ct. 228, 42 L.Ed.2d 181 (1974), stating that “[f]ailure to specify the precise location of the offense is not fatal if the district is alleged.” From this statement they infer an alternative rule that where the district is not alleged, the fai…