MID-FLORIDA TELEVISION CORP.

v.

TV 9, INC., ET AL.; AND FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION V. TV 9, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Metro Broad., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 497 U.S. 547 (U.S. 1990)
  …oadcast Hearings, 1 F. C. C. 2d 393 (1965). See, e. g., Mid-Florida Television Corp., 33 F. C. C. 2d 1 (Rev. Bd.), review denied, 37 F. C. C. 2d 559 (1972), rev’d, TV 9, Inc. v. FCC, 161 U. S. App. D. C. 349, 495 F. 2d 929 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 986 (1974). The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the FCC’s position on statutory grounds. See TV 9, 161 U. S. App. D. C., at 356-358, 495 F. 2d, at 936-938. The court rejected the FCC’s arguments that “the Communications…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Garrett v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 513 F.2d 1056 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …in Grantell Broadcasting Co., 23 FCC 2d 74, 18 RR 2d 1063 (1970). Id. at 113-115 (emphasis supplied). . See id. at 114, 115, quoted supra notes 6, 36. . Id. at 115, quoted supra note 6. . 161 U.S.App.D.C. 349, 495 F. 2d 929 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 986, 95 S.Ct. 245, 42 L.Ed.2d 194 (1974). It will be noted that TV 9 was decided after the administrative decisions in the instant litigation. . In our supplemental opinion in TV 9, 161 U.S.App.D.C. at 361, 495 F. 2d at 941, we distinguished our use of…
• Browning v. Navarro, 743 F.2d 1069 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …f separate and independent claims), second removal petitions, see, e.g., O’Bryan v. Chandler, 496 F. 2d 403 (10th Cir.) (developments subsequent to and not concluded by prior remand order provide grounds for a second removal petition), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 986, 95 S.Ct. 245, 42 L.Ed.2d 194 (1974); Cliett v. Scott, 233 F. 2d 269 (5th Cir.1956) (same), and conditional judgments, see, e.g., Zintmaster v. Werner, 41 F. 2d 634 (3d Cir.1930) (enforceability of judgment conditioned on party’s perfecting title to…