PENNYWELL

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• Clark v. State, 379 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1979)
  …ling. There is no suggestion that the selection process in Pinellas County systematically and intentionally excludes any economic, social, religious, racial, political, or geographical group. See Reed v. State, 292 So. 2d 7 (Fla.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 995, 95 S.Ct. 307, 42 L.Ed.2d 268 (1974); State v. Silva, 259 So. 2d 153 (Fla.1972). Clark also made a motion to have the rule allowing cameras in the courtroom during his trial declared unconstitutional or, in the alternative, to have the trial court…
• Valle v. State, 474 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 1985)
  …ction 40.01 against the argument that the selection of juries solely from voter lists was defective. See, e.g., Bryant v. State, 386 So. 2d 237 (Fla.1980); Johnson v. State, 293 So. 2d 71 (Fla.1974); Reed v. State, 292 So. 2d 7 (Fla.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 995, 95 S.Ct. 307, 42 L.Ed.2d 268 (1974); Jones v. State, 289 So. 2d 385 (Fla.1974). Appellant has failed to overcome the presumptive fairness of the source of the petit jurors. Finally, we find no basis for quashing the indictment or setting aside app…
• United States v. Papia, 560 F.2d 827 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …trive conscientiously to clear up any confusion created by his initial charge to the jury, he is not bound to give unqualified answers to specific questions posed by the jury. See United States v. Joyner, 494 F. 2d 501, 507 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 995, 95 S.Ct. 308, 42 L.Ed.2d 268 (1974); United States v. Cleveland, 477 F. 2d 310, 314-15 (7th Cir. 1973). This is particularly true where, as here, an unqualified “Yes” or “No” answer may well mislead the jury. [*844] We believe that under the circum…