HEDDEN

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• Rosebrough Monument Co. v. Mem'l Park Cemetery Ass'n, 666 F.2d 1130 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …rain competition exists. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States, 306 U.S. 208, 221-27, 59 S.Ct. 467, 472-74, 83 L.Ed. 610 (1939); Treasure Valley Potato [*1140] Bargaining Ass’n v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc., 497 F. 2d 203, 208 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 999, 95 S.Ct. 314, 42 L.Ed.2d 273 (1974). When the circumstantial evidence leads to the conclusion that concerted or collaborative action has been contemplated and undertaken by competitors with the purpose and effect of eliminating competition among th…
• United States v. Dairymen, Inc., 660 F.2d 192 (6th Cir. 1981)
  …solely for the purpose of setting uniform prices for their members. Id.; Fairdale Farms, Inc. v. Yankee Milk, Inc., 635 F. 2d 1037 (2d Cir. 1980); Treasure Valley Potato Bargaining Ass’n v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc., 497 F. 2d 203 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 999, 95 S.Ct. 314, 42 L.Ed.2d 273 (1974). As a result; an agricultural cooperative can willfully attain a monopoly through the voluntary enrollment of its members, or through a voluntary combination with other cooperatives. The mere accretion of monopol…
• Fairdale Farms, Inc. v. Yankee Milk, Inc., 635 F.2d 1037 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …ion. Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co., 370 U.S. 19, 29, 82 S.Ct. 1130, 1135, 8 L.Ed.2d 305 (1962). See Treasure Valley Potato Bargaining Association v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc., 497 F. 2d 203, 213-17 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 999, 95 S.Ct. [*1040] 314, 42 L.Ed.2d 273 (1974). Fairdale’s first argument is based upon a misreading of the Act and was properly rejected by the district court. Fairdale’s second argument is predicated upon a hyper-technical reading of the statute. C…