ADAMS ET AL.

v.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Bosse v. Crowell Collier AND MacMillan, 565 F.2d 602 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …icient “state action” to activate the fourteenth amendment due process protections. This claim essentially has been addressed and rejected by our court in Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F. 2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006, 95 S.Ct. 325, 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974). We adopt the Adams analysis here to reject plaintiffs’ argument.8 The fact that Arizona’s enactment of these provisions greatly changed Arizona law in this area rather than merely codifying a preexisting commo…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Northrip v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 527 F.2d 23 (6th Cir. 1975)
  …the other decisions upholding § 9-503 are Gibbs v. Titelman, 502 F. 2d 1107 (3d Cir. 1974), Shirley v. State National Bank, 493 F. 2d 739 (2d Cir. 1974), Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F. 2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006, 95 S.Ct. 325, 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974), Bitchel Optical Laboratories, Inc. v. Marquette National Bank, 487 F. 2d 906 (8th Cir. 1973). 'in Global Industries v. Harris, 376 F.Supp. 1379 (N.D.Ga.1974), the court upheld a power of sale foreclosure statut…
• Parks v. "MR. Ford", 556 F.2d 132 (3d Cir. 1977)
  …Cir. 1975), the Ninth Circuit invoked this reasoning in distinguishing its conclusion that detention pursuant to a landlord’s lien was state action from its decision in Adams v. Southern Calif. Natl Bank, 492 F. 2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006, 95 S.Ct. 325, 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974), which held that self-help repossession is not state action. See also James v. Pinnix, 495 F. 2d 206 (5th Cir. 1974) (self-help repossession not state action; distinguishes Hall v. Garson, [*148] 430 F. 2d 430 (5…

  ← 1 / 3 →