MATTHEWS CO. ET AL.

v.

WILLIAMS

Citator

Cited By (46 total)

• Justine A. Higdon v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 446 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …esting Corp. v. G.C. Murphy Co., 434 F. 2d 521 (D.D.C.1970); Monarch Insurance Co. of Ohio v. District of Columbia, 353 F.Supp. 1249, 1259-60 (D.D.C.1973), aff'd sub nom., Aetna Insurance Co. v. United States, 497 F. 2d 683 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1021, 95 S.Ct. 497, 42 L.Ed.2d 295 (1974). Accordingly, we find that Count I fails to state a cause of action. COUNT II In Count II of the complaint, plaintiff alleged that the defendants violated the black community’s right to equal protection by dec…
• Citizens TO Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …ossible inequitable results produced by the retroactive application of an administrative rule against the demands of statutory design.”); People of State of California, State Lands Comm’n v. Simon, 504 F. 2d 430, 438-39 (Em.App. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1021, 95 S.Ct. 496, 42 L.Ed.2d 294 (1974) (“A retroactive rule is invalid, generally speaking, only if unreasonable.”); General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. United States, 449 F. 2d 846, 863 (5th Cir. 1971) (“Where a rule has retroactive effects, it may…
• Standard OIL Co. v. Dep't OF Energy, 596 F.2d 1029 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1978)
  …involving various factual situations. In resolving this difficult and crucial issue [*1057] under the unusual circumstance of this case, a review of prior decisions is helpful. In California v. Simon, 504 F. 2d 430, 439 (Em.App.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1021, 95 S.Ct. 496, 42 L.Ed.2d 294 (1974), an action against the administrator of the FEO, we held that “substantial compliance with rule making requirements is essential to the validity of administrative rules”, but we declined to follow “a doctrine of…