YOUNG

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Noble C. Beasley, 2 F.3d 1551 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …briefs. This omission on the part of either of these parties is negligent at best. . R6-500. . R6-505. . United States v. Veteto, 701 F. 2d 136, 139-40 (11th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Barcenas, 498 F. 2d 1110, 1113 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1036, 95 S.Ct. 521, 42 L.Ed.2d 312 (1974)), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1212, 103 S.Ct. 3548, 77 L.Ed.2d 1396 (1983). . See id. at 140. . R10-1606-1607, R10-1630-1631. . See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F. 2d 1335, 1354 (11th Cir.1984) ("prosecutorial appe…
• United States v. Wentland, 582 F.2d 1022 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …e to instruct the jury sua sponte on withdrawal from a conspiracy neither affected defendant’s substantial rights nor deprived him of a fair trial and was not plain error. See United States v. Barcenas, 498 F. 2d 1110, 1113 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1036, 95 S.Ct. 521, 42 L.Ed.2d 312 (1974); Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b). Finally, Wentland insists that the evidence presented was insufficient to support his conviction for mail fraud and conspiracy. A jury’s verdict “must be sustained if there is substantial e…
• United States v. Garrett, 583 F.2d 1381 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …Where the trial court has accorded all the relief requested or has had no request for relief, a reversal can only be based on appropriate application of the plain error rule.” United States v. Barcenas, 498 F. 2d 1110, 1113 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1036, 95 S.Ct. 521, 42 L.Ed.2d 312 (1974). Each case must be judged on its own particular facts in making a plain error determination. United States v. Barcenas, 498 F. 2d 1110, 1113 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1036, 95 S.Ct. 521, 42 L.Ed.2d 312 (…

  ← 1 / 2 →