MYERS, DBA ROMYCO STEREO

v.

AMPEX, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Blackshear, 568 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …use of the trial court’s discretion in admitting the evidence over the only objections made by defense counsel, particularly in view of the cautionary instructions by the court. United States v. Walker, 497 F. 2d 1050, 1052 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1037, 95 S.Ct. 524, 42 L.Ed.2d 314 (1974). Furthermore, we are not free to construct a Rule 609 violation argument for the defendant because the issue was not made and preserved in the trial court as required by Rule 103 of the Federal Rules of Evidence…
• Oswald A. Pennisi v. Alexander, 611 F.2d 566 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …district court to re-examine and possibly supplement the record thereby removing any doubt that plaintiff’s present action should be barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel. Myers v. Ampex, Inc., 491 F. 2d 1103, 1104 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1037, 95 S.Ct. 524, 42 L.Ed.2d 314 (1974). On remand, the parties should be given the opportunity to litigate the merits of the affirmative defense of res judicata. Moch v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, 548 F. 2d 594, 596 n.3 (5th Cir.), cert. de…