CLINGON

v.

MISSISSIPPI

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hooshang Hooshmand, 931 F.2d 725 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …Blue Cross, which the indictment identified as an agent of HHS, as a charge that Dr. Hooshmand presented a false claim to an agency of the United States. This reading is supported by United States v. Catena, 500 F. 2d 1319 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1047, 95 S.Ct. 621, 42 L.Ed.2d 641 (1974), which upheld convictions for violating Section 287 where the evidence established that the defendant caused Blue Cross to submit false claims to HHS’ predecessor agency, the Department of Health, Education, and…
• United States v. Lurz, 666 F.2d 69 (4th Cir. 1981)
  …nder Fed. R. Crim.P. 14 if the defendant makes a substantial showing of prejudice. The granting of severance is committed to the discretion of the district court. See, e.g., United States v. Catena, 500 F. 2d 1319, 1326 (3d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1047, 95 S.Ct. 621, 42 L.Ed.2d 641 (1974); United [*78] States v. Clayton, 450 F. 2d 16, 18 (1st Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 975, 92 S.Ct. 1200, 31 L.Ed.2d 250 (1972). There was more than ample similarity between the conspiracy and continuing cri…
• United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …objection. Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury and, on request of any party, out of the presence of the jury. . Appellant’s reliance on United States v. Mackay, 491 F. 2d 616 (10 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1047, 95 S.Ct. 619, 42 L.Ed.2d 640 (1974), is misplaced. In that case the defendants were given 15 consecutive one-year sentences plus substantial fines for a single fraudulent scheme involving multiple mailings. The court noted that it had “repeatedly h…