TAYLOR

v.

UNITED STATES; AND HEARN V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• Burkett v. State, 518 So. 2d 1363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …s v. Wooten, 503 F. 2d 65 (4th Cir. 1974) (firearm possession conviction was properly predicated on a conviction pending on appeal which was later affirmed); United States v. Andrino, 497 F. 2d 1103 (9th Cir.), cert, den., Andrino v. United States, 419 U.S. 1048, 95 S.Ct. 621, 42 L.Ed.2d 642 (1974) (expungement of state felony convictions did not preclude the defendant’s being considered a convicted felon within the federal firearms statutes where the expungement statute precluded possession of firearms);…
• United States v. Oates, 560 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …possess heroin with the intent to distribute. While of course the government is correct with regard to the conspiracy charge, see, e.g., United States v. Galante, supra at 737-38; United States v. Hearn, 496 F. 2d 236, 241 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1048, 95 S.Ct. 622, 42 L.Ed.2d 642 (1974), we believe the government’s position is unsupportable with respect to the “charge” of aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute. To be sure, Count Two of the indictment here charged that “the defe…
• United States v. Papia, 560 F.2d 827 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …of Criminal Procedure is discretionary, and a trial judge’s refusal to grant severance will cause reversal on appeal only if there has been a clear abuse of discretion. United States v. Pacente, 503 F. 2d 543, 546 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1048, 95 S.Ct. 623, 42 L.Ed.2d 642 (1974). We cannot say that “the facts and law presented to the trial judge at the time of the motion for severance demonstrated that a trial under joinder was likely to be unfair and that the trial was in fact unfair.”…