HART

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers of Am., Afl-Cio, 428 U.S. 397 (U.S. 1976)
  …F. 2d 1236 (CA5 1975), reh. denied, 526 F. 2d 376 (1976), cert. denied, post, p. 910, but at odds with decisions of the Third, Fourth, and Eighth Circuits, NAPA Pittsburgh, Inc. v. Automotive Chauffeurs, 502 F. 2d 321 (CA3) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 1049 (1974); Island Creek Coal Co. v. Mine Workers, 507 F. 2d 650 (CA3), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 877 (1975); Armco Steel Corp. v. Mine Workers, 505 F. 2d 1129 (CA4 1974), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 877 (1975); Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Teamsters, 497…
• Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers OF Am., AFL-CIO, 545 F.2d 1336 (3d Cir. 1976)
  …l testimony and evidence, inasmuch as the district court having understandably regarded the primary issue as being governed by NAPA Pittsburgh, Inc. v. Automotive Chauffeurs, Local Union No. 926, 502 F. 2d 321 (3d Cir. 1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1049, 95 S.Ct. 625, 42 L.Ed.2d 644 (1974), had no reason to consider the concepts discussed here. No reason has been given in either Speetro Foods or Latrobe as to why we should deprive the district courts of the complete and effective utilization of a…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Intertherm, Inc., 596 F.2d 267 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …hews & Co. v. N. L. R. B., 354 F. 2d 432, 439-44 (8th Cir. 1965). And, obviously, implied threats of discharge, such as that made by Vogt, are also violations. Federal Prescription Service v. N. L. R. B., 496 F. 2d 813, 816 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1049, 95 S.Ct. 624, 42 L.Ed.2d 643 (1974); N. L. R. B. v. Midwest Hanger Co., supra, 474 F. 2d at 1162; N. L. R. B. v. Speed Queen, supra, 469 F. 2d at 192. Two more alleged Gustine Plant violations relate to a company reprimand issued to employee Rober…