HAWKINS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Galiffa, 734 F.2d 306 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …urther contends that his presence at the rear of the truck and his subsequent flight when the officers raided the Ingleside house is insufficient to establish possession. See United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 492 F. 2d 109, 115 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1052, 95 S.Ct. 630, 42 L.Ed.2d 647 (1974). We would agree with Galiffa if this was all that the evidence demonstrated. However, the evidence presented at trial goes well beyond these assertions. In MacPherson two defendants were arrested off the coast o…
• United States v. Mieres-Borges, 919 F.2d 652 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …more, does not establish participation in a conspiracy.” See also United States v. Castro, 723 F. 2d 1527, 1534 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. DeSimone, 660 F. 2d at 537; United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 492 F. 2d 109, 115 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1052, 95 S.Ct. 630, 42 L.Ed.2d 647 (1974). Presence and flight must be considered along with other evidence, and the reviewing court should consider whether, under the totality of the circumstances, there is sufficient evidence to support a jury verdic…
• United States v. Lamont S. Carter, 522 F.2d 666 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …is late date that in considering the suffi [*689] ciency of the evidence following a conviction, the Government is entitled to the benefit of all reasonable inferences. United States v. Mackin, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 427, 502 F. 2d 429, 441, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1052, 95 S.Ct. 629, 42 L.Ed.2d 647 (1974); Crawford v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 156, 375 F. 2d 332 (1967). In my view, Carter’s conviction of theft, under all of the evidence so clearly establishing his guilt, should be affirmed.7 . That drawing…