MCCOY

v.

LAVALLEE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Gray, 565 F.2d 881 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …v. Edwards, 5 Cir., 1974, 488 F. 2d 1154, 1163; Doughty v. Beto, supra; United States v. Frugé, 5 Cir., 1974, 495 F. 2d 557; Hora v. State of Louisiana, 5 Cir., 1974, 495 F. 2d 1248; Lee v. Hopper, 5 Cir., 1974, 499 F. 2d 456, 462-65, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1053, 95 S.Ct. 633, 42 L.Ed.2d 650; Fitzgerald v. Estelle, 5 Cir., 1975, 505 F. 2d 1334, 1338-42 (en banc), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1011, 95 S.Ct. 2636, 45 L.Ed.2d 675; Loftis v. Estelle, 5 Cir., 1975, 515 F. 2d 872, 875-76; Howard v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 1…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Capone, 683 F.2d 582 (1st Cir. 1982)
  …tes v. Rajewski, 526 F. 2d 149, 161 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 908, 96 S.Ct. 2231, 48 L.Ed.2d 833 (1976) (the trial judge has discretion to formulate exact language); United States v. Santana, 503 F. 2d 710, 716 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1053, 95 S.Ct. 632, 42 L.Ed.2d 649 (1974), 420 U.S. 963, 1006, 95 S.Ct. 1352, 1450, 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975) (“no talismanic formula has been prescribed as a caution to be given to a jury regarding accomplice testimony”); United States v. Morgan, 555 F. 2d…
• United States v. Moreno, 536 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …sion, if correct, would provide the requisite justification for excluding Roe’s testimony. U. S. v. Gloria, 494 F. 2d 477 (CA5), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 995, 95 S.Ct. 306, 42 L.Ed.2d 267 (1974); U. S. v. Lacouture, 495 F. 2d 1237 (CA5), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1053, 95 S.Ct. 631, 42 L.Ed.2d 648 (1974).4 But the defendants are in a difficult position. They cannot challenge the substance of the Fifth Amendment ruling because they did not hear what the judge heard. Thus they take the position that they should hav…

  ← 1 / 2 →