WATERS

v.

ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By (58 total)

• Scott v. State, 330 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
  …t’s resistance to that arrest was unlawful. Compare City of Cincinnati v. Karlan, 35 Ohio St.2d 34, 298 N.E. 2d 573, 578 (1973); vacated 416 U.S. 924, 94 S.Ct. 1922, 40 L.Ed.2d 280; reaffirmed 39 Ohio St.2d 107, 314 N.E. 2d 162 (1974); cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1056, 95 S. Ct. 640, 42 L.Ed.2d 654. I do not think White v. State, Fla.1976, 330 So. 2d 3, requires a different result. I would therefore affirm the judgment and sentence in this cause.…
• United States v. Carson, 702 F.2d 351 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …(1973) (expert opinion of DEA agent that coded conversations involved narcotics transaction admissible); see also, United States v. Martino, 664 F. 2d 860, 864 n. 3 (2d Cir.1981); United States v. Grillo, 499 F. 2d 872, 881 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1056, 95 S.Ct. 638, 42 L.Ed.2d 653 (1974). “[T]he trial judge has broad discretion in the matter of the admission or exclusion of expert evidence, and his action is to be sustained unless manifestly erroneous.” 3 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein’s Evi…
• United States v. Murad Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1987)
  …the admission of expert testimony to explain the use of narcotics codes and jargon in intercepted conversations. E.g., United States v. Ginsberg, 758 F. 2d 823, 830 (2d Cir.1985); United States v. Cirillo, 499 F. 2d 872, 881 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1056, 95 S.Ct. 638, 42 L.Ed.2d 653 (1974). We acknowledge some degree of discomfiture in cases such as the instant one in which this practice is employed, since, uncontrolled, such use of expert testimony may have the effect of providing the government…