MAGEE

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Am. Bldg. Maint. Indus., 422 U.S. 271 (U.S. 1975)
  …ffidavits by both parties, the District Court granted the appellee’s motion for summary judgment, holding that there had been no violation of § 7 of the Clayton Act. The Government brought an appeal to this Court, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 419 U. S. 1104.1 I The appellee, American Building Maintenance Industries, is one of the largest suppliers of janitorial services in the country, with 56 branches serving more than 500 communities in the United States and Canada. It is also the single largest su…
• United States v. Tax Comm'n of Miss. (W.D. Pa. 1975)
  …(1974). For the same reason, the District Court held that the tax upon the sales to the two concurrent jurisdiction bases was not an unconstitutional tax upon instrumentalities of the United States. Id., at 569. We again noted probable jurisdiction, 419 U. S. 1104 (1975). We reverse. III The exception in § 107 (a) is plainly a congressional preservation of federal immunity from any state tax that [*605] would violate the principle of McCulloch v. Maryland, supra, prohibiting state taxation of instrumentalit…
• Mattern v. Caspar W. Weinberger, 519 F.2d 150 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …o note that two other Circuits have concluded that due process requires a hearing in cases involving termination of social security payments. Eldridge v. Weinberger, 493 F. 2d 1230 (4th Cir. 1974), aff’g 361 F.Supp. 520 (W.D.Va.1973), cert. granted, 419 U.S. 1104, 95 S.Ct. 773, 42 L.Ed.2d 800 (1975); Williams v. Weinberger, 494 F. 2d 1230 (5th Cir. 1974), aff’g 360 F.Supp. 1349 (N.D.Ga.1973). B. Another contention raised by the Secretary is more convincing. This argument is that recoupment cases present is…