GARVEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …lve situations in which the government or the defendant questioned a witness or a co-defendant, knowing that a valid, unwaived Fifth Amendment privilege would be asserted. E. g., United States v. Roberts, 503 F. 2d 598 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113, 95 S.Ct. 791, 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975); United States v. Beye, 445 F. 2d 1037 (9th Cir. 1971); Sanders v. United States, 373 F. 2d 735 (9th Cir. 1967). She fails to offer support relating to the very different problem, present in our case, in which th…
• United States v. Kirk, 534 F.2d 1262 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …was also allegedly involved in the drug distribution scheme. “The likelihood that the loss was prejudicial is eased by the reliability of the evidence presented by the government.” United States v. Norton, 504 F. 2d 342 (8th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113, 95 S.Ct. 790, 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975). The government’s evidence concerning the transactions and conversations in which Nofles was involved was substantial and reliable. Balancing this evidence and the fact that prior to trial Nofles’ written stateme…
• United States v. Coronado, 554 F.2d 166 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …ature of the problem renders impossible an exposition of exactly what the district court should tell the defendant in various cases involving varying crimes. Our statement in United States v. Gearin, 496 F. 2d 691, 696 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113, 42 L.Ed.2d 810 (1975) provides a useful point of departure: district courts should address the problem on the assumption that the defendant is ignorant of the nature of the charges.9 Thus the types of statements included in jury charges may provide…