COCHRAN

v.

UNITED STATES; AND HORNSBY V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (101 total)

• United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 (U.S. 1975)
  …ompel the defense to reveal the relevant portions of the investigator’s report for the prosecution’s use in cross-examining him. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded that it cannot. 501 F. 2d 146. We granted certiorari, 419 U. S. 1120 (1975), and now reverse. I Respondent was tried and convicted on charges arising from an armed robbery of a federally insured bank. The only significant evidence linking him to the crime was the identification testimony of two witnesses, a bank te…
• United States v. Myers, 550 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …, 506 F. 2d 416, 418 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 967, 95 S.Ct. 1957, 44 L.Ed.2d 454 (1975); United States v. Register, 496 F. 2d 1072, 1077-78 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied sub nom.; Cochran v. United States and Hornsby v. United States, 419 U.S. 1120, 95 S.Ct. 802, 42 L.Ed.2d 819 (1975). Applying these principles to the California incident initially, it is apparent that the events do not support the first of the four inferences. The only evidence that Myers or Coffie attempted to flee from the…
• United Hous. Found., Inc. v. Forman (W.D. Pa. 1975)
  …immunity claims by the state parties were unavailing.11 Accordingly, the [*847] case was remanded to the District Court for consideration of respondents’ claims on the merits. In view of the importance of the issues presented we granted certiorari. 419 U. S. 1120 (1975). As we conclude that the disputed transactions are not purchases of securities within the contemplation of the federal statutes, we reverse. II Section 2 (1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U. S. C. § 77b (1), defines a “security” as “an…