RAVEN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (73 total)

• Baker v. State, 425 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
  …. 417, 175 N.E. 278 (1930); State v. Moore, 326 Mo. 1199, 33 S.W. 2d 905 (1930); Usary v. State, 172 Tenn. 305, 112 S.W. 2d 7 (1938); State v. Brooks, 215 Wis. 134, 254 N.W. 374 (1934). . In State v. Beamon, 298 So. 2d 376 (Fla.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124, 95 S.Ct. 809, 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975), since Beamon was charged twice with robbery, it is obvious that the court was using the word “offense” to relate to the factual event. In Miles v. State, 418 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), each count of the tw…
• Hoffman v. State, 397 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 1981)
  …pecification of date in a bill of particulars is to narrow the Indictment or Information as to the time within which the act or acts allegedly constituting the offense may be proved. State v. Beamon, 298 So. 2d 376, 378-79 (Fla.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124, 95 S.Ct. 809, 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975). Both Howlett and now Hoffman hold that a statement of particulars can be amended if such amendment will not prejudice the defendant. A review of the purpose of statements of particulars and the interplay of such…
• Tingley v. State, 549 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1989)
  …of limitations time period. Tingley, 495 So. 2d at 1183 (footnotes omitted) (citing 3 Wharton’s Criminal Procedure § 273 (12th ed. 1975); Hunter v. State, 85 Fla. 91, 95 So. 115 (1923); cf. State v. Beamon, 298 So. 2d 376 (Fla.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1124, 95 S.Ct. 809, 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975); Straughter v. State, 83 Fla. 683, 92 So. 569 (1922)). We agree with the district court’s decision. Although time is an important part of a charging document, it is not a substantive element of this offense. It i…