NORTH CENTRAL TRUCK LINES, INC.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• City OF Rome v. United States, 446 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1980)
  …ailout suit. Alaska v. United States, C. A. No. 78-0484 (DC May 10, 1979) (stipulated dismissal of action). One other State — Virginia—has attempted to bail out under § 4 (a). Virginia v. United States, 386 F. Supp. 1319 (DC 1974), summarily aff’d, 420 U. S. 901 (1975). The court held that Virginia did not satisfy § 4 (a) because a state literacy test administered in some localities between 1963 and 1965 was discriminatory in the context of the inferior education offered to Virginia blacks in certain rural…
• Battle v. Park J. Anderson, 564 F.2d 388 (10th Cir. 1977)
  …burden which defendants have in order to justify a stay is to show that no substantial harm will come to the other interested parties if the stay is granted. North Central Truck Lines, Inc., v. United States, 384 F.Supp. 1188 (W.D.Mo.1974), aff’d., 420 U.S. 901 [95 S.Ct. 820, 42 L.Ed.2d 832.] The defendants largely ignore this requirement. The evidence of existing environmental health and safety problems in the system is overwhelming. There is no doubt that the overcrowding increases the incident of both…
• United States v. Gitcho, 601 F.2d 369 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …but the description has other parts which identify the place to be searched with particularity, searches pursuant to such warrants have been routinely upheld. See, e. g., United States v. Shropshire, 498 F. 2d 137 (6th Cir. 1974), appeal dismissed, 420 U.S. 901, 95 S.Ct. 838, 42 L.Ed.2d 845 (1975); United States v. Pisano, 191 F.Supp. 861 (S.D.N.Y.1961). Other factors which have been cited in upholding searches made pursuant to search warrants which contained some inaccuracies in the description of the p…