GILMORE

v.

HOGAN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Serafin Alfonso, 759 F.2d 728 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …rs. We concluded that it was not reasonably certain that contraband found was in the vehicle when it came across the border. Id. at 876. And the same defect of certainty was found in United States v. Anderson, 509 F. 2d 724 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 910, 95 S.Ct. 831, 42 L.Ed.2d 840 (1975), where a vehicle made several stops at the crossing, picking up and discharging passengers, one of whom was seen retrieving a package hidden near a palm tree. We held that given the breaks in surveillance, it was…
• United States v. Brown, 562 F.2d 1144 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …against delay in disclosure to the defendants. The decision whether to compel disclosure of an informant’s identity at all is within the trial court’s discretion. United States v. Anderson, 509 F. 2d 724, 729-30 (9 Cir. [*1149] 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 910, 95 S.Ct. 831, 42 L.Ed.2d 840 (1975). Since the court might have been justified under the circumstances to refuse to compel disclosure at all, it was well within its discretion to refuse to compel disclosure earlier than actually occurred. See Unite…
• United States v. Avarello, 592 F.2d 1339 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …h Cir. 1977). Moreover, we cannot say that the obvious impropriety had a substantial impact on the jury’s verdict against Bowers. E. g., United States v. Klein, supra; United States v. Constant, 501 F. 2d 1284, 1287-89 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 910, 95 S.Ct. 830, 42 L.Ed.2d 840 (1975). The taped conversations to which Bowers was a party, as we shall explain below, presented undeniable proof that Bowers was relaying the bets of others to Wood. Thus, the general reference to “a misdemeanor or a…