LEKOMETROS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Frost v. Caspar Weinberger, 515 F.2d 57 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …ly disinterested as between the two sets of claimants should help to insure a correct pre-reduction decision. Cf. Crow v. California Dep’t of Human Resources Dev., 490 F. 2d 580, 584 (9 Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded for consideration of mootness, 420 U.S. 917, 95 S.Ct. 1110, 43 L.Ed.2d 388 (1975). We thus hold that the SSA’s procedures for a preliminary pre-reduction determination on papers, to be followed by a full post-reduction hearing if requested, conform to the requirements of due process. In so r…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Stone v. Philbrook, 528 F.2d 1084 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …ask for a three-judge court, cf. Crow v. California Dept. of Human Resources, 325 F.Supp. 1314 (1970), rev’d, 490 F. 2d 580 (9 Cir. 1973), vacated and remanded for consideration of mootness; if not moot, for consideration of three-judge requirement, 420 U.S. 917, 95 S.Ct. 1110, 43 L.Ed.2d 388 (1975). We happily leave those problems to another day. III. If § 2142.4 of the Commission’s Regulations and other regulations we have cited are consistent with the Vermont statute, as the district court assumed, its…