IN RE DISBARMENT OF OSBORNE

Citator

Cited By

• Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (U.S. 1976)
  …In No. 74-1419, the defendant Attorney General cross-appeals from that part of the judgment holding § 6 (1) unconstitutional and enjoining enforcement thereof. We granted the plaintiffs' application for stay of enforcement of the Act pending appeal. 420 U. S. 918 (1975). Probable jurisdiction of both appeals thereafter was noted. 423 U. S. 819 (1975). For convenience, we shall usually refer to the plaintiffs as “appellants'' and to both named defendants as “appellees.” Ill In Roe v. Wade the Court conclud…
• United States Dist. Court for the Dist. of N.J. v. Abrams, 423 U.S. 1038 (U.S. 1975)
  …ion. A federal court may well determine that conduct found tolerable by another jurisdiction merits disbarment in federal court, as our actions disciplining members of this Court’s Bar implicitly demonstrate. See, e. g., In re Disbarment of Osborne, 420 U. S. 918 (1975); In re Disbarment of Buttles, 419 U. S. 1101 (1975); In re Disbarment of Mades, 414 U. S. 1154 (1974). A federal court must apply state law in diversity cases, but there is not the slightest reason to do so in judging the conduct of members…
• United States v. Maine, 469 U.S. 504 (U.S. 1985)
  …U. S. 515, 517, n. 1 (1975). See also 400 U. S. 914 (1970); 403 U. S. 949 (1971); 404 U. S. 954 (1971); 408 U. S. 917 (1972); 412 U. S. 936 (1973); 419 U. S. 814 (1974); 419 U. S. [*507] 1087 (1974); 419 U. S. 1102 (1975); 420 U. S. 904 (1975); and 420 U. S. 918 (1975). Subsequently, the coastline of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts was determined in part by a supplemental decree issued by this Court. See United States v. Maine (Massachusetts Boundary Case), 452 U. S. 429 (1981). New York and Rhode Islan…