FOREMOST-MCKESSON, INC.

v.

PROVIDENT SECURITIES CO.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1976)
  …certiorari because of the importance of the issue in the measure of the Court of Claims' statutory jurisdiction, and because of the significance of the court's decision upon the Commission's administration of the civil service classification system. 420 U. S. 923 (1975). II We turn to the respective statutes that are advanced as support for the action taken by the Court of Claims. A. The Tucker Act. The central provision establishing the jurisdiction of the court is that part of the Tucker Act now codifie…
• Dep't of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (U.S. 1976)
  …court and Agency, applied to the summaries, will yield edited documents sufficient for the purpose sought and sufficient as well to safeguard affected persons in their legitimate claims of privacy.” Ibid. (Footnotes omitted.) We granted certiorari, 420 U. S. 923 (1975). We affirm. I The District Court made factual findings respecting the administration of the Honor and Ethics Codes at the Academy. See Pet. for Cert. 28A-29A, nn. 5, 6. Under the Honor Code enrolled cadets pledge: “We will not lie, steal, o…
• Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 (U.S. 1976)
  …order for remand and (2) that the Court of Appeals [*342] had no jurisdiction to review that order or to issue mandamus because of the prohibition against appellate review contained in 28 U. S. C. § 1447 (d). We granted the petition for certiorari, 420 U. S. 923 (1975), and now reverse. II Title 28 U. S. C. § 1441 (a) provides that unless otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction,…