SCHICK

v.

REED, CHAIRMAN, UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE, ET AL.; TOLLETT V. LAMAN ET AL.; MARSHALL ET AL. V. OHIO; KENSINGER V. OHIO; POMMERENING ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; WASHBURN V. UNITED STATES; SMART V. JONES ET AL.; HALE V. UNITED STATES; O'BRIEN V. CALIFORNIA; MEYERS V. VENABLE ET AL.; AGUR V. WILSON, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, ET AL.; PAQUETTE V. LAVALLEE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT; BARTLETT V. TOLEDO BAR ASSN.; RATCLIFF V. TEXAS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Gandy v. State OF Ala., 569 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …irfax’s Devisee, 3 Dallas 305, 1 L.Ed. 613 (1796). . See Shirley v. North Carolina, 528 F. 2d 819, 822 (4th Cir. 1975); United States ex rel. Lucas v. Regan, 365 F.Supp. 1290, 1292-93 (E.D.N.Y. 1973), affd, 503 F. 2d 1 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 939, 95 S.Ct. 1149, 43 L.Ed.2d 415 (1975). . United States v. Sexton, supra; United States v. Terry, 449 F. 2d 727 (5th Cir. 1971); United States ex rel. Baskerville v. Deegan, 428 F. 2d 714 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 928, 91 S.Ct. 193, 27 L.Ed.…
• Smart v. Jones, 530 F.2d 64 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …f a similar action brought by plaintiff’s wife which raised identical factual and legal issues, and grew out of the same incident, Smart v. Jones, 493 F. 2d 663 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090, 95 S.Ct. 681, 42 L.Ed.2d 682, rehearing denied, 420 U.S. 939, 95 S.Ct. 1151, 43 L.Ed.2d 417 (1975), the district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On this appeal plaintiff Smart raises several issues of error. Finding none to be of merit, and agreeing with the district court that the caus…