RICHARDS

v.

NORTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By (58 total)

• Vt. Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 435 U.S. 519 (U.S. 1978)
  …for each conclusion that further consideration of a suggested alternative is unwarranted.” Id., at 331, 547 F. 2d, at 628, quoting from Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. FPC, 163 U. S. App. D. C. 334, 337, 502 F. 2d 336, 339 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U. S. 946 (1975). While the court’s rationale is not entirely unappealing as an abstract proposition, as applied to this case we think it basically misconceives not only the scope of the agency’s statutory responsibility, but also the nature of the administr…
• United States v. Edwards, 577 F.2d 883 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …, 1568, 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973), stated that: Presence of the defendant at the search and seizure was held, in Jones, to be a sufficient source of standing in itself. . See also United States v. McConnell, 500 F. 2d 347 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied 420 U.S. 946, 95 S.Ct. 1327, 43 L.Ed.2d 424 (1975); United States v. Mendoza, 473 F. 2d 692 (5th Cir. 1972). . Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 261, 80 S.Ct. 725, 731, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960). . Although the Court in Opperman, supra, 428 U.S. at 367, 96 S.Ct…
• Papago Tribal Util. Auth. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 628 F.2d 235 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. FPC, 538 F. 2d 966, 970 (2d Cir. 1976). In such a case immediate review might not invade the province of the agency. For example, in Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. FPC, 502 F. 2d 336 (D.C.Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 946, 95 S.Ct. 1326, 43 L.Ed.2d 424 (1975), this court reviewed an order of the Commission suspending a new electric rate filing. Ordinarily, such an order is nonreviewable because the decision to suspend or not to [*244] suspend a rate filing is entrust…