BISHOP

v.

ROSE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Beard v. Mitchell, 604 F.2d 485 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …of this court. Beard v. Robinson, 563 F. 2d 331 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 907, 98 S.Ct. 3125, 57 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1978). . The conviction was upheld by this court in United States v. Robinson, 503 F. 2d 208 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 949, 95 S.Ct. 1333, 43 L.Ed.2d 427 (1975). . The complaint also named Stanley Robinson, William O’Neal, an F.B.I. informant, and unnamed F.B.I. officials as defendants in the action. Robinson was dismissed by stipulation of the parties. The plaintiff’s…
• United States v. Theo Donald McDANIEL, 550 F.2d 214 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …on with an obliterated serial number, possession of the same weapon that is also unregistered, and transportation of that weapon are not a “single act.” The Government relies on United States v. Kiliyan, 504 F. 2d 1153 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 949, 95 S.Ct. 1333, 43 L.Ed.2d 428 (1975), which upheld the imposition of two consecutive eight-year sentences for violations of § 5861. The Court held that the transfer of firearms without paying a transfer tax, § 5861(e), and the making of firearms wi…
• United States v. Clark J. Umentum, 547 F.2d 987 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …n cases involving a § 371, Title 18, charge, or a charge under its predecessor, which by their language required an overt act.2 Defendant further relies on other cases, such as United States v. Robinson, 503 F. 2d 208 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 949, 95 S.Ct. 1333, 43 L.Ed.2d 427 (1975), a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 241, which likewise contains no overt act requirement. In that case there was proof of overt acts. The opinion does not reveal whether or not overt acts were also alleged. The is…