CUYLER, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

v.

MATTHEWS

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188 (U.S. 1977)
  …olding in Thevis I. See, e. g., United States v. Linetsky, 533 F. 2d 192 (1976); United States v. Thevis, 526 F. 2d 989 (1976) (Thevis II), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 928 (1976). See also United States v. Hill, 500 F. 2d 733 (CA5 1974), cert. denied, 420 U. S. 952 (1975). And the Ninth Circuit, following Hamling, has reached the same result. United States v. Cutting, 538 F. 2d 835 (1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1052 (1977). Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. Californ…
• United States v. Louin Ray Bright, 630 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …mere association with nefarious characters is not a ground to convict. The charge given35 clearly eon [*823] veys that message, without quoting directly from a case. Accord, United States v. Hill, 500 F. 2d 733, 737-38 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 952, 95 S.Ct. 1336, 43 L.Ed.2d 430 (1975). The second charge complained of36 was the court’s charge37 on circumstantial evidence. The charge given was approved in United States v. Ransom, 515 F. 2d 885, 890 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 944,…
• United States v. Satterfield, 743 F.2d 827 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …ant a mistrial lies within the sound discretion of the trial judge since he is in the best position to evaluate the prejudicial effect of a statement or evidence on the jury. United States v. Hill, 500 F. 2d 733, 739-40 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 952, 95 S.Ct. 1336, 43 L.Ed.2d 430 (1975). We agree with the district court that the prejudice to Satterfield resulting from the mistaken reading of the unedited indictment was minimal. It is permissible to include an alias in an indictment if the Gove…